Monday, July 14, 2008

Developments

New offices at Maling Square. See post below for details
of Newcastle's already extensive stock of empty offices.



A new development looms over Stepney Bank.

Battlefield (a.k.a. the City Stadium) overlooks the Ouseburn Valley; indeed, was built over it in the late nineteenth century. The Ouseburn was until recently a scene of industrial activity and associated pollution. A lead factory was once a prominent feature of the Lower Valley. Today there is no single activity which defines the Valley. A large scrap metal facility; a national centre for the Children's Book; a stables for the promotion of horse riding; a floor carpet outlet; a music and entertainment venue; a 'city farm'; a fine art print studio; numerous small businesses. The variety of enterprises are matched by the variety of buildings, some dating back to the earliest days of the valley's occupation, some brand new. Several old buildings have been given a a face lift or adapted to new purposes such as the National Centre for the Children's Book. By the late 20th century, the Lower Ouseburn began to attract the far-sighted, especially creative people; a theatre company set up in the Cluny, a former warehouse, and a pattern familiar from other cites of creative minded people seeing the 'hidden potential' so-called run down areas resulted. 

The Ouseburn Trust
has helped establish the district's credentials as a centre for creative endeavour through a combination of regeneration and recovery. Access to the city of Newcastle is via the Quayside, itself the focus of ambitious and (mostly) successful regeneration. It the case of the Quayside the impetus was provided by commercial drive; few old buildings survive. Instead a fresh start produced some striking designs, though subsequently the architecture has been markedly utilitarian, and a dilution has occurred. New projects are less post-modern than opportunist. (Further west along the river at Forth Banks new buildings have sprung up which lack any visual reference point except 'corporate Mediterranean hotel'.)

There are alarming signs that the opportunists have Ouseburn in their sights. The attractions are obvious. The 'business model' is well tested and practically writes itself. Artistic and community enterprises make attractive (and amiable) neighbours. The sheer variety of building types also are attractive to many, especially the young. They are 'trendy'. Once the pioneers 'break the soil' as it were – usually with public money – the developers follow, falling over themselves to grab as much as possible and move on. Democratically the local authority ought to provide the check upon them. However, in recent years successive governments have made the process easy for speculative developers and harder to resist. It fact most local authorities will not take steps to block developers since bearing subsequently the entire legal costs can be so onerous. In effect many undesirable schemes – undesirable in the sense that the proposal cuts through existing plans or conservation area objectives – get through by brute force.

There ought to be some common sense applied here. It is so obviously in the interests of all that development and re-generation go forward together and at a steady pace. Sudden over-kill will jeopardise everyone's investment, both of financial and human resources. Do the 'men in the white Porches' get it? I doubt very much if they do. One cloud on their skyline presently is the current 'credit crunch' and its associated economic problems. This may force speculators to re-think their commitment, always a pragmatic affair: How much can I make? 

My own guide to these matters is the largely forgotten architectural critic
Ian Nairn (1930–1983). I read Nairn's London Observer column years ago  and discovered in him those sympathies for relationships which helped me appreciate the built environment. His warnings – he coined the term "Subtopia" as a portmanteau word to cover his most pressing concerns about the negative impacts of planning – seem prescient. Alas, much of what he wrote is out of print. Nairn I am certain would have lots to say about Ouseburn. The different flavours, facets and prospects which are contained within the small compass of the Valley. I very much hope these can survive the present scramble.



Sunday, July 13, 2008

High Summer

Since I returned to the scene it seemingly has hardly stopped raining. One way to reflect on wet days is to imagine the good the rain does to flowering plants. Here is a sample of some of those I found growing around Battlefield and the former paint factory.

More soon on the future for Battlefield and the prospects for the Ouseburn Valley as I perceive them.



Broom Cytisus scoparius (I think ...)

White Clover Trifolium repens plus fungi

Bindweed Calystegia sepium (probably)

Purple-Loosestrife Lythrum hysoppifolia


Dandelion Taraxacum officinale seed head


Wednesday, July 9, 2008

I'm back!



A long trip away to the far north (above) and then difficulties gaining access to my own blog (passwords forgot and so on and on) have come to an end. Just in time.

Yet further office "developments" for the upper Ouseburn are in train. I will being commenting on these and posting more photographs soon.

Meanwhile Battlefield is looking very verdant. I imagine the rain and then sun have produced excellent growing conditions. The photographic evidence for this will also be appearing soon. I will keep you posted!

Friday, May 9, 2008

BREAKING NEWS!

9th May 2008

The long anticipated proposal to build over the former paint factory site is in. Newcastle City Council (NCC) has released few details but the scale of the proposal is mind boggling.

"Erection of eight blocks of residential development comprising 504 units with ancillary A1,A2 and A3 uses in 5 of the blocks at level 1 and provision of multi storey car park (305) spaces, surface car park (97 spaces) and undercroft car parking (320 spaces)".

In other words a massive development, with towers over-topping the Battlefield-City Stadium open space, presumably affording top floor (penthouse?) tenants or owners exclusive views of the Tyne far below.

The site is described as "to the east of Portland Road". They must be able to do better than that.

But that's it. No name of developer (naturally) and no drawings, artist's impressions, nothing. Bleak, ain't it?

Your servant has been on to NCC (who are acting as bag carriers for the developers) with the following observations:

"The description of the development is scant. The location is vague. The scale of the development is in an area presently with few amenities apart from open space, which itself may be adversely affected by this proposal if it receives planning consent. The area is adjacent to the Lower Ouseburn and may have a detrimental impact on further beneficial developments in this area. Traffic implications for the surrounding roads are unclear but must be considerable given the size of the undertaking.


I welcome developments which will enhance the area and actively progress what the successful regeneration projects have achieved thus far. But any future developments must not detract from these achievements if maximum long term utilisation of this historic district is to be assured.


Until a clearer and transparent description of the proposal is forthcoming I wish to register my opposition to this scheme on the following grounds.


1. Preserving the gains made by various parties to the historic character of the Lower Ouseburn which this proposed development will abut.


2. Unknown design and build considerations. Until a firm description of the size, build quality and landscaping can be obtained the scheme is an unknown quantity.


3. Unknown impacts on the local environment including open green space. Potential impacts on the visual quality of the historic Ouseburn area.


4. Traffic management issues on approach roads.


5. Long term issues for living and working in the Ouseburn – South Jesmond district. Determining and meeting long term objectives for the district."


 


To view the scant details available go to www.newcastle.gov.uk/planning.

From the open page click "Terms and Conditions" and then proceed to "Open Public Access for Planning Now". The click on "Planning". The Application number is as follows:

2008/0759/01/OUT.

The advice given to me was "click the arrow on the right hand side of the screen for full details" – if these exist I could not see them.

Please do submit your comments and if you are, like me sceptical until some detail is available, register your dissent by clearly stating your OBJECTION. Please use the actual word, for, as I have discovered, if the word is not there then you did not object, merely complain.

More soon. We can be sure of that.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

"Wrong sort of offices"

Vacancies:

By Central Station

Brand new and as yet no takers.

Plenty of space ... 

... old space...

... chic space with more to come.

In a telephone conversation with me in 2002 a Newcastle City Council official discussed the 'need' for office space in the city. As posts below set out, the plan for Battlefield involved a 'business park' on the site of the former Berger paint factory and, in order to maximise the developer's gain, extensive car parking over the Battlefield/City Stadium site. One plan – there were three 'alternatives' – spoke of thirteen hundred spaces.

When I pointed out that there were, even then, empty office blocks all over the city he replied "They are the wrong sort of offices".

The situation has not changed much as these photographs demonstrate. All were taken on 5th May 2008. For the good of the city and employment prospects generally I sincerely hope all these premises attract tenants soon. Yet, I am wondering "Who benefits?" My feeling is that it is the building itself, often financed by 'off shore' investors seeking to create an asset irrespective of need, that is the point.


Coming soon: Ouseburn the alternative strategy!