Thursday, February 18, 2016

Making every thing nice ... Part One

I have wanted to point out something for a while. The two universities in this city have become businesses; they do not yet attach 'p.l.c.' to their titles but that is what they are, weird but I think true. They have adopted a corporate style, advertise like the large utility companies or media conglomerates. They promote a discernible 'business model'. Well, what is wrong with that? It is only realistic policy. After all, education is just like any other business when one comes down to it.

Of course, I do not believe it is. But I am hopelessly old fashioned now. This city grew on coal and then engineering, making armaments and ships. Coal and iron ore built ships. Now having suffered enormous industrial decline and closures – industrial history in this part of the world has been landscaped with grass – education and the tens of thousands of students the universities and colleges have attracted, is now the new industrial base. The money this attracts is quite easily more than in the dying days of industrial power, even allowing for inflation. It's a winner in lots of ways.

Except one important way that is growing. The privatisation and control of public spaces.

Take Northumberland Road.

In theory, if not fact, this view is of a public road, what was once quaintly called 'the [Queen's, King's] High Road. For centuries blocking or hindering anyone, be they ever so humble, using such a highway was an offence. I don't know if Northumberland Road exists as a public right of way any longer. I fear its days may be numbered. If they are, what then?

It would be misleading of me to write that this arcane legal definition is what is really troubling me. No, it's the dreadful 'corporate' feel that has spread out over these spaces that concerns me. Things such as these:

 I have never yet seen anyone sitting on one of these things. They are very popular with designers. I have found them in other places, usually associated with offices, insurance and banking, that kind of thing. All this 'hard' and 'soft' landscaping achieves is to iron out eccentricity, nuance and the quirky and organic nature of spaces. In large cities the preferred option now is for everywhere to look like everywhere else, no matter. It seems the 'powers that be' want uniformity and a particularly uninteresting, soulless environment. It always gives me the impression I am somewhere I do not belong and the places themselves seem like machines. Here the idea is to give the impression of money, or at least, look interested in the thought.

Universities were once entirely about ideas, all kinds from classics to economics, music and philosophy, engineering and science. But above all knowledge. Now the big idea is the money business.

Expenditure or investment?

Another timely article about the creeping privatisation of public spaces.


From the article:

"Our parks are in the midst of a funding crisis which will almost certainly see the commercial world take another step inside our public space. Despite the widely recognised benefits that parks provide – in terms of health and wellbeing, social cohesion and biodiversity, as well as protection against flooding and defence against pollution – there is no national body to protect them and no statutory requirement for councils to pay for them."

No surprise there. Private good, public bad it seems.

My question is this: What does private enterprise get for its money? I know what the public looses.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Corporatre space

This is apposite.

I have been pondering writing about what I have seen as a creeping 'corporatisation of public space' across Newcastle and especially around the two Universities and, by extension, their ever expanding property portfolios. Quite apart from the possibility, real not imaginary, that sometime soon we public types will find ourselves shut out or severely curtailed in our daily lives by the 'ownership' of prime city locations and bylaws enforced by private security companies, the designed and over designed spaces themselves are spreading an anodyne and sensation-less landscape of nothingness, removing all those features that make cities interesting, confusing and an expressive presence. I am glad to learn I am not alone. The example given in the link is London, but it applies equally to Newcastle. Or soon will.

So this is apposite (Off site link.)

The comments includes this link to a Channel Four interview that sums up the gulf that exists between corporatist encroachment and defenders public space (Off site link.)

More on this theme to come.